刚才看1984时一直在想的一个问题
文字和画面的关联...一般来说,作者用好几页,大篇幅来描写的东西,如果拍成电影的话3秒钟就能解决问题,不划算啊不划算...
文字(esp叙事小说)的最高境界是有画面感,电影的理想状态是有文学性, 有意思阿有意思... 你不觉得1984里面那些描写给人一种身临其境的压迫感么
那些生活的细节..
比如最开始写胜利大厦那些...
用几秒的电影画面又怎么能够给你...入髓的感觉 语言自有它独特的魔力~
但是“身临其境的压迫感“，用画面也完全可以做到的，而且我认为，是一种捷径：） 比如1984里面那些....无形的压迫感...被人无所不在的监视的那种感觉..
行么
我觉得1984很屎
1984很完美````不过我那本没有插图``` when i read the book which has been filmize before i see the film
i can imagine every scene -- howthey move they talk
and i can control the rhythm -- if i'm not interested in this part i can skim over
then i see thatmovie
the other guy have created the image
maybe the same as mine maybe not
ican only sit about waiting the time elapse ...
and some fictionssuch as 1984
readingthem is better than watching their movieedition Yea you can say that again!
one can find much more freedom and imaginary space in literature than in image.
页:
[1]